USPTO serial 78067335
HATCH SHELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HATCH SHELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing an on-line interactive advertising web site featuring information about Boston, Massachusetts, namely, listings and images of concerts, outdoor and indoor events, establishments, visitors guides, and outdoor and indoor virtual tours of Boston | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |