USPTO serial 78067739
SPEAKER'S MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEAKER'S MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ANNUAL PUBLICATIONS, PARTICULARLY PERIODICALS DEALING WITH VENUES AND PROVIDING LEADS POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE FOR SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |