USPTO serial 78068706
ZERO FOOTPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZERO FOOTPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | spectrum analyzers; network analyzers; optical spectrum analyzers; optical network analyzers; optical time domain reflectmeter; digital multimeters; dc voltage/current generators; multi-channel digital recorder; frequency counters; pulse pattern generator; error detector; protocol analyzer; digital spectrum analyzers; bluetooth tester; laser diode test system; applied electronic machines and apparatus, namely, testers for testing semiconductors, namely, large scale integrated circuits (LSI) and very large scale integrated circuits (VLSI), system on a chip (SOC), logic, memory, flash memory, radio frequency integrated circuits (RFIC), mixed-signal, liquid crystal display (LCD) driver, image sensor, e-beam, and test handler; computer software for testing semiconductors namely, large scale integrated circuits and very large scale integrated circuits, system on a chip, logic, memory, flash memory, radio frequency integrated circuits, mixed-signal, liquid crystal display driver, image sensor, e-beam, and test handler for use in the civilian industry, namely, the telecommunications industry, the mobile communications industry, the network communications industry, the medical industry, the aircraft industry, and the household electronic appliance industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |