USPTO serial 78068836
QUINTA REAL GRAND CLASS HOTELS & RESORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUINTA REAL GRAND CLASS HOTELS & RESORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Quinta Real Promocion, S.A. de C.V.
Col. Tlacopac, San Angel, MX
Other trademarks owned by Quinta Real Promocion, S.A. de C.V.
Quinta Real Promocion, S.A. de C.V.
Col. Tlacopac, San Angel, MX
Other trademarks owned by Quinta Real Promocion, S.A. de C.V.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hotel services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |