USPTO serial 78069213
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Victoria, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (based on 4(d) and 1(b)) Skin care products made in whole or in significant part from organic botanical ingredients, namely bar soap,; (based on 1(b)) Skin care products made in whole or in significant part from organic botanical ingredients, namely, facial cleansers, skin creams, skin lotions, skin toners, beauty masks, facial scrubs, skin soaps, namely liquid soap and vegetable soaps; (based on 1(b)) Bath products made whole or in significant part from organic botanical ingredients, namely, namely non-medicated bath-salts, non-medicated deodorants and antiperspirants, bath gels, shower gels, bath oils, scented body sprays, body lotions, body moisturizers, and body scrubs; (based on 1(b)) Oral care products made in whole or in significant part from organic botanical ingredients, namely toothpaste, toothpowder, non-medicated mouthwash, aroma therapy products, namely essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |