USPTO serial 78069308
THE BRAINY BABY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BRAINY BABY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSONP O BOX 7929ATLANTA, GA 30357-0929UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS AND RETAIL, CATALOG, INTERNET, AND TELEMARKETING SERVICES FEATURING PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, COMPACT DISCS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, TOYS, GAMES, BOOKS, CLOTHING, ARTS AND CRAFTS, AND INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION AND THE PRODUCTION OF VIDEO TAPES, AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |