USPTO serial 78070588
NATURAL TEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159655Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURAL TEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
OAKVILLE, CT
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
OAKVILLE, CT
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
OAKVILLE, CT
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRACEE A GRAUBART
GERALD B SWEENEY SWEENEY LEV460 BLOOMFIELD AVE STE 200MONTCLAIR, NJ 7042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH WITH FLUORIDE, NAIL MOISTURIZERS, FLUORIDE AND CALCIUM NAIL TREATMENTS, NAIL BUILDERS TO INCREASE THICKNESS, NAIL STRENGTHENERS, NAIL POLISH TOP COATS AND SEALERS, NAIL POLISH BASE COATS, NAIL CUTICLE CONDITIONERS AND TREATMENTS, WAX TREATMENTS; ANTIBACTERIAL SOAPS, NAMELY, ANTI-BACTERIAL HAND SCRUBS; NAIL CLEANSERS, BAR SOAPS, LIQUID SOAPS, ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS FOR NAILS, NAIL POLISHING STONES, NAIL BUFFING CREAMS, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, COTTON NAIL POLISH REMOVER PADS, NAIL POLISH REMOVER IN JARS WITH INTERNAL MECHANICAL PADS, SPONGES OR MOLDED INSERTS TO FACILITATE AND ACCELERATE POLISH REMOVAL; HAND CARE PREPARATIONS NAMELY, HAND LOTION, HAND CREAMS, SUNSCREEN LOTIONS, SKIN TONERS, BLEMISH LIGHTENERS; FOOT AND TOENAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, FOOT CREAMS AND MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, SKIN SLOUGHING LOTIONS, BUFFING CREAMS, TOENAIL POLISH WITH FLUORIDE, TOENAIL STRENGTHENER TREATMENTS WITH FLUORIDE; ANTIBACTERIAL SOAPS, NAMELY, ANTI-BACTERIAL FOOT SCRUBS; EFFERVESCENT CRYSTALS FOR BATHS AND FOOT BATHS, BAR SOAPS, FOOT SOAKS, BATH SALTS, COOLING GELS, FRAGRANCED FOOT POWDERS AND SPRAYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 9, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY TREATMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NATURAL TEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |