USPTO serial 78070618
PHATCUSHION.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHATCUSHION.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Seat padding and cushioning for land, air, and water vehicles; seat padding and cushioning for land, air, and water vehicles for use as a covering; acoustical resistance padding, thermal resistant padding, electrical resistant padding and vibration resistance padding for land, air, and water vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Acoustical resistance padding, thermal resistant padding, electrical resistant padding and vibration resistance padding for buildings; wall padding and padding for impact protection in buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Rubber and/or resin based flooring, rubber and/or resin based flooring underlayment; rubber and/or resin based siding and rubber and/or resin based fencing panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Pillows, upholstery cushioning and padding for furniture; cushions | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpet underpadding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phat Cushion, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Phat Cushion, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named PHATCUSHION.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |