USPTO serial 78071052
HOMERESOURCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMERESOURCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Energy financing services | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1998 |
| 037 | Energy-related services, namely water heater installation, repair and replacement; installation of electrical systems, namely outdoor lighting; surge protection installation | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1998 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely the electronic transmission of massages and data in voice, facsimile, video, electronic mail, and messaging; computer services, namely providing multiple user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1998 |
| 042 | Energy-related services, namely conducting energy inspection audits; consultation services, namely certifying and warranting after inspection that homes meet energy-efficient standards | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |