Drawing for FOREVER

USPTO serial 78071097

FOREVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOREVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRENT E. ROUTMAN

BRENT E ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Materials for constructing decks and decking accessories, namely, a thermoplastic biofiber composite materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 4, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 1, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance