Drawing for KRUPNIK

USPTO serial 78071253

KRUPNIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRUPNIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Horst M. Kasper, Esq.

HORST M KASPER ESQ HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka, distilled spirits, potable spirits, brandy spirits, liqueurs, herb liqueurs, honey liqueurs, distilled liquor, extracts of spirituous liquors.; Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka, distilled spirits, potable spirits, brandy spirits, liqueurs, herb liqueurs, honey liqueurs, distilled liquor, extracts of spirituous liquors.ACTIVEJan 31, 1969

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 1, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance