USPTO serial 78072743
NEW SUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3114770Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEW SUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW CANAN, CT
Bereldange, LU
Bereldange, LU
LOS ANGELES, CA
CARPINTERIA, CA
Carpinteria, CA
CARPINTERIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Hyman
Jonathan A. Hyman Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main StreetFourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY[, BREAKFAST CEREALS, MARGARINE AND MARGARINE SUBSTITUTES] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by THE FRS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NEW SUN NUTRITION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW SUN NUTRITION LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEW SUN NUTRITION LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NEW SUN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |