Drawing for PATIENT-CONNECT

USPTO serial 78074988

PATIENT-CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PATIENT-CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES M. GIBSON

JAMES M GIBSON FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, hosting, developing, and maintaining web sites for and on behalf of pharmaceutical companies which provide disease management services and patient support; provide news and information to patients, doctors, nurses, and pharmacists about diseases; encourage proper and persistent treatment of diseases; and allow various persons involved in treating a particular disease to track treatment persistence and communicate with each other and with the pharmaceutical companyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 18, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 24, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 31, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED
Jul 30, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED
Jul 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance