USPTO serial 78076242
CRYOPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2739342Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2003
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYOPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Covington, LA
Covington, LA
CIMEX MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, L.C.
COVINGTON, LA
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Regard
Joseph T. Regard Joseph T. Regard, Ltd plcPO Drawer 429Madisonville, LA 70447-0429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely handheld cryosurgical devices for the removal of heat from a target area | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cimex BioTech LC
- Other trademarks owned by Cimex BioTech LC
- Other trademarks owned by CIMEX MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by CRYOPEN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CRYOPEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 12, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |