USPTO serial 78076673
MR. PENTILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MR. PENTILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Sebastopol, CA
ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Sebastopol, CA
GYEONGGI-DO, KR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | liquid crystal display screens; semiconductor control chip for controlling liquid crystal display screens; computer software for enabling liquid crystal display screen display; computer software for creating images for display on liquid crystal display screen; data compression software; and computer hardware and software for electronic imaging, namely, for generating, storing, transmitting and manipulating of graphic images, both natural images such as photographic stills and motion pictures, and computer generated images, namely, text, icons, animation, and the like, for computer display screens, projectors, televisions, cameras, cell phones, and other portable electronic equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MR. PENTILE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |