USPTO serial 78077482
T-PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T-PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAN, CT
CARPINTERIA, CA
Luxembourg, LU
Luxembourg, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | MINERAL WATER AND TABLE WATER; ISOTONIC DRINKS, HYPOTONIC DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS; SMOOTHIES, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT NECTARS, FRUIT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, COLAS, POP, LEMONADE, ISOTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, AND SPORT DRINKS; NON-ALCOHOLIC PREPARED COCKTAIL MIXES; BEER-BASED COOLERS; FLAVORED BREWED MALT-BASED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF BEER; FRUIT-BASED SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA; SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCEGEN HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FRS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEW SUN NUTRITION LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named T-PLUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |