USPTO serial 78077767
ICONVERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3532347Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ICONVERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter Steimel, Jr.
Walter Steimel, Jr. LOEB & LOEB LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4797UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Billing services; business invoicing services; utility bill management services, namely, tracking, reporting, analyzing and delivering energy information in the form of utility bills and utility meter data rate schedules; Integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions on a global computer network; Tracking, locating and monitoring of vehicles, maritime vessels, and aircraft services; Compilation, management and analysis of business data for others, namely, compiling, processing, and analyzing environmental data for commercial enterprises and utilities providers for use in business and commercial planning, marketing and management; Providing statistical information to utilities providers and commercial business enterprises for use in business and commercial planning and management purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2008 |
| 042 | Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; Electric meter reading and data analysis; Gas meter reading and data analysis; Measuring, evaluating and reporting on environmental conditions, namely, providing pollutant, heat, light and weather reporting services; Metering and monitoring electric power consumption by third parties for electric power providers; and Water meter reading and data analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steimel, Walter, Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Steimel, Walter, Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Steimel, Walter, Jr.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ICONVERGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |