USPTO serial 78079076
I MODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3214637Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2007
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I MODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of telecommunication networks, installation of communication equipment, maintenance and repair of communication equipment; installation and repair of telecommunication equipment, including disinfecting telephone sets; installation, repair and maintenance of submarine cables, aerial power transmission wire, communication equipment for use in buildings, telecommunication for control in building, telecommunication systems, telecommunication equipment for use in buildings, telecommunication facilities, data communication facilities, and computer systems; underground construction of telephone line; providing information relating to construction projects; supervision and consultation in the field of construction and civil engineering works; maintenance of electrical facilities installed in buildings, and maintenance of building facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, metal treatment, treatment of paper, gum, plastics, food, lumber, stones and ceramics; heat treatment, coating of plastics, electroplating of metals; drying, dyeing, fireproofing, permanent press, bleaching, deodorizing, pre-shrinking, waterproofing and moth proofing of cloth, clothing and lumber; material treatment information in the field of metal treatment, treatment of metal treatment, treatment of paper, gum, plastics, food, lumber, stones and ceramics; heat treatment, coating of plastics, electroplating of metals; drying, dyeing, fireproofing, permanent press, bleaching, deodorizing, preshrinking, waterproofing and moth proofing of cloth, clothing and lumber | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha NTT DoCoMo
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha NTT DoCoMo
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha NTT DoCoMo
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named I MODE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |