Drawing for I MODE

USPTO serial 78079076

I MODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3214637Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with I MODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation of telecommunication networks, installation of communication equipment, maintenance and repair of communication equipment; installation and repair of telecommunication equipment, including disinfecting telephone sets; installation, repair and maintenance of submarine cables, aerial power transmission wire, communication equipment for use in buildings, telecommunication for control in building, telecommunication systems, telecommunication equipment for use in buildings, telecommunication facilities, data communication facilities, and computer systems; underground construction of telephone line; providing information relating to construction projects; supervision and consultation in the field of construction and civil engineering works; maintenance of electrical facilities installed in buildings, and maintenance of building facilitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials, namely, metal treatment, treatment of paper, gum, plastics, food, lumber, stones and ceramics; heat treatment, coating of plastics, electroplating of metals; drying, dyeing, fireproofing, permanent press, bleaching, deodorizing, pre-shrinking, waterproofing and moth proofing of cloth, clothing and lumber; material treatment information in the field of metal treatment, treatment of metal treatment, treatment of paper, gum, plastics, food, lumber, stones and ceramics; heat treatment, coating of plastics, electroplating of metals; drying, dyeing, fireproofing, permanent press, bleaching, deodorizing, preshrinking, waterproofing and moth proofing of cloth, clothing and lumberSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006ADBS1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED—
Aug 30, 2006PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 11, 2006PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance