USPTO serial 78082229
DIABLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIABLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Alleman
MARK D ALLEMAN ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BROADWAY STE 600PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND ELECTRONICS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 014 | JEWELRY, KEY FOBS, KEY CHAINS, AND WATCHES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 018 | CLOTHING ACCESSORIES INCLUDING WALLETS, UMBRELLAS, AND PURSES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 020 | SLEEPING BAGS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | LUNCH BOXES, VACUUM FLASKS, FOOD CONTAINERS, THERMALLY INSULATED CONTAINERS FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES, ICE CHESTS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 024 | HOUSEWARES INCLUDING BEDDING, SHEETS, PILLOWCASES, BLANKETS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 028 | MASQUERADE COSTUMES, MASKS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | FOOD INCLUDING SNACKS, FROZEN MEALS, JUICE DRINKS, CEREAL, CHIPS, CANDY | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 032 | BEVERAGES INCLUDING CARBONATED BEVERAGES AND SPORTS DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vivendi Universal Interactive Publishing North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DIABLO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |