USPTO serial 78083692
PILLCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PILLCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
TALLY EITAN EITAN, PEARL, LATZER & COHEN ZEDEK LLP10 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 1001NEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, video capsule for use in medical diagnosis, namely, electronic capsule which is swallowed, moves through the digestive tract and is excreted for use in diagnosing diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.; Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, video capsule for use in medical diagnosis, namely, electronic capsule which is swallowed, moves through the digestive tract and is excreted for use in diagnosing diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.; Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, video capsule for use in medical diagnosis, namely, electronic capsule which is swallowed, moves through the digestive tract and is excreted for use in diagnosing diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |