USPTO serial 78086191
THE HEIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HEIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gaming devices, namely slot machines, with or without video output | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |