Drawing for SHATTER AUDIO

USPTO serial 78086777

SHATTER AUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHATTER AUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anas A. Akel

ANAS A AKEL HANDAL & ASSOCIATES1200 3RD AVE STE 1321SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009All portable, home, or mobile audio, video, home theater, and navigational products or systems of any nature, namely, radios; CD players/recorders; amplifiers and decoders; radios incorporating clocks; home stereos comprised of receivers, tuners, and speakers; boom boxes; audio cassette players/recorders; audio receivers; audio tuners; audio speakers; power inverters; liquid crystal displays; MP3 players/recorders; DVD players/recorders; televisions; video cassette players/recorders; set top interface boxes for the transmission of cable, satellite, and broadband signals; and flat screen computer and video monitors---[UNDER SECTION 1(A)]; All portable, home, or mobile audio, video, home theater, and navigational products or systems of any nature, namely, WMA players/recorders; global positioning satellite systems consisting of antenna, decoder, reader, processor, and monitor; personal video recorders; and satellite receivers---[UNDER SECTION 1(B)]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Apr 20, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 12, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 8, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance