USPTO serial 78087341
ARPU FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARPU FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nanterre Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAY19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010-7108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific teaching apparatus and instruments, namely CRM, mobile payment, technology over the air, SIM cards for telecommunications, for the purpose of offering to telecom operators software applications and solutions for them to increase their average revenue per user and margin, while paving the way for future mobile business | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising agencies; business management information on a wide variety of topics to service providing professionals; arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in the field of user and service management, mobile payment, CRM, SIM card for telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Scientific research; industrial research in the field of user and service management, mobile payment, CRM, SIM card for telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |