USPTO serial 78091195
HAND IN HAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAND IN HAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
REYNOLDS, OH
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Colucci
FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANS101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, namely, aftershave, antiperspirant, artificial nails, astringents for cosmetic purposes, namely, astringents for the face and skin, bath beads, bath oil, bath salts, blush, body glitter, body oil, body scrub, bubble bath, cologne, cream for the body, cream for the cuticles, cream for the eyes, cream for the face, cream for the hands, personal deodorant, essential oils for personal use, exfoliators for the skin, eye gels, eye makeup pencils, eye shadow, face highlighter, facial masks, face mist, face scrub, foot soak, foundation, fragrant body splash, fragrant body mist, hair conditioner, hair dyes, hair glitter, hair highlighter, hair mascara, hair pomade, hair removing cream, hair rinses, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair straightener, hair styling gel, hair styling mousse, lotion for the body, lotion for the face, lotion for the hands, lip balm, lip gloss, lip liner, lip makeup pencils, lipstick, makeup for the body, makeup for the face, makeup remover, mascara, nail corrector pens, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail stencils, non-medicated blemish stick, non-medicated cleanser for the face, non-medicated foot spray, non-medicated mood enhancing skin massage ointment, non-medicated mood enhancing skin cream, oil blotting sheets for the skin, perfume, powder for the body, powder for the face, powder for the feet, pumice stones for personal use, salt scrubs for the skin, shaving cream, shower gel, skin bronzing cream, soap for the body, soap for the face, soap for the hands, sun block for the body, sun block for the face, suntan lotion for the body, suntan lotion for the face, sunless tanning lotion for the body, sunless tanning lotion for the face, pre-suntanning lotion for the body, pre-suntanning lotion for the face, post-suntanning lotion for the body, post-suntanning lotion for the face and talcum powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Beauty Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Beauty Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HAND IN HAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |