USPTO serial 78091549
CALLCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2972626Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CALLCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PALO ALTO, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF VOICE DATA, IMAGES, AUDIO, VIDEO, AND INFORMATION VIA TELEPHONE AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; PROVIDING AND FACILITATING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO GLOBAL TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING AND FACILITATING MULTIPLE USER INTERACTIVE ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIVEOPS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Trenchard, William James
- Other trademarks owned by Trenchard, William James
- Other trademarks owned by Trenchard, William James
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CALLCAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |