Drawing for EZ PAK

USPTO serial 78095302

EZ PAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ PAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judy McCool

JUDY MCCOOL PFIZER INC201 TABOR RDLEGAL DIVISION/ 56/2/SMORRIS PLAINS, NJ 79502693

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 13, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Oct 13, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 13, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance