USPTO serial 78095772
XOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINE COVERDALE
CHRISTINE COVERDALE LAW OFFICES OF ALLEN HYMAN10737 RIVERSIDE DRNORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry 14K and Sterling Silver Jewelry; Bracelets, Rings Being Jewelry, Watches, Pendants, Broaches | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |