Drawing for SQRAT

USPTO serial 78096063

SQRAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4159256Status 780Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2012
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SQRAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil Burstein

Neil Burstein Law Offices of Neil Burstein63 Winterberry CircleCross River, NY 10518

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009motion picture films featuring animation, pre-recorded video tapes, video cassettes, video discs, DVDs featuring animation; pre-recorded phonographs, audio tapes, audio cassettes, audio compact discs featuring music; computer game cassettes, cartridges and CD-ROMS; prerecorded computer and video software featuring animation films; mouse padsACTIVEOct 1, 1999
016Children's books, picture books, coloring books, puzzle books, poster books, fiction books; greeting cards; notepads, stationery; stickers, temporary tattoos, trading cards; posters; wrapping paper, calendarsACTIVEJul 15, 1999
024Textile wall hangingsACTIVEJun 23, 2000
028Hand held computer games; party favors; manipulative and jigsaw puzzlesACTIVENov 23, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2022NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2022RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 28, 202289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 28, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2022E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 11, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 11, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2020TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 20, 2020CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2020CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 27, 2018NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 20188.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 25, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2018ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 27, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 12, 2012R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
May 10, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2012CNSRALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 7, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2012SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 8, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 27, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 17, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 19, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance