USPTO serial 78098107
PEEK-HT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEEK-HT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lancashire, GB
Lancashire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Evans
J SCOTT EVANS ADAMS SCHWARTZ & EVANS PA2180 TWO WACHOVIA CTR301 S TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28282Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed plastics in the nature of thermoplastic resins; unprocessed plastics materials in the nature of polymers for general industrial use; unprocessed plastics in the form of powders, pastes, granules, emulsions and dispersions, all for general industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastics for use in manufacture, namely plastics in the form of bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes for use in manufacturing; plastics in semi-finished form for use in manufacture, namely, plastic in the form of pellets for use in manufacturing; plastics in the form of rods, blocks, tubes, films, foil and sheets, all for use in manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |