USPTO serial 78100239
INSYSTEMS XTERITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSYSTEMS XTERITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
JASON M DRANGEL BAZERMAN & DRANGEL, PC60 E 42ND STSTE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used by businesses to enable internal business processes to be used in online business environments; computer software for providing an integrated set of platform, tools and applications for creating and managing online businesses; computer software for use in the capture, organization, analysis, and management of information, across multiple channels, related to customers, and sales and marketing systems; computer software for managing individual relationships with customers, partners and regulators in the financial services and insurance industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation; integration of computer systems; computer software design for others; maintenance of computer software and programs; rental of computer software; installation of computer software for others and technical computer support, namely, telephone and on-site computer consultation in connection with the operation and maintenance of computer hardware and software up-dating of computer programs for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |