Drawing for HOME THEATER STORE

USPTO serial 78100430

HOME THEATER STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME THEATER STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Tidwell

MARK A TIDWELL BRACEWELL & PATTERSON, LLPP O BOX 61389HOUSTON, TX 77208-1389UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENTACTIVEDec 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 2, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 6, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 30, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 14, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 16, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 18, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance