Drawing for RIPPLE EFFECTS

USPTO serial 78106978

RIPPLE EFFECTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIPPLE EFFECTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JILL ANDERFUREN

JOHN M WILKE NEWELL RUBBERMAID6833 STALTER DR STE 101ROCKFORD, IL 61108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026NON-ELECTRIC HAIR CURLERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance