Drawing for NEUROCELLULAR

USPTO serial 78108290

NEUROCELLULAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROCELLULAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD Y KIM

RICHARD Y KIM MCDERMOTT WILL EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communication technology, consisting of miniaturized, highly intelligent, self learning network access portal computer hardware, software, transmitters and receivers that dynamically adjust radio frequencies and radio power levelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 12, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 11, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 16, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 16, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 6, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 25, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance