USPTO serial 78109857
TROPICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TROPICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S FIRST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Supervision services for building construction; installation of building insulation; services in the nature of building of fair stalls and shops, building sealing services; building demolition, namely, services in the nature of clearing of exterior surfaces of buildings, cleaning of interiors of buildings, cleaning of exterior surfaces of buildings; construction planning; construction equipment rental services; construction information services; damp-proofing services for buildings; building demolition services; factory construction services; furniture maintenance services; cabinet repair services; furniture restoration services; kitchen equipment installation services; interior and exterior painting services in the field of commercial and domestic buildings; plastering services; plumbing services; window cleaning services;; Supervision services for building construction;building insulating services; services in the nature of building of fair stalls and shops; building sealing services; services in the nature of clearing of exterior surfaces of buildings, cleaning of interior of buildings, cleaning of exterior surfaces of buildings; construction services; construction equipment rental services; construction information services; damp-proofing services for buildings; building demolition services; factory construction services; furniture maintenance services; cabinet repair services; furniture restoration services; kitchen equipment installation services; interior and exterior painting services; plastering services; plumbing services; crane and construction equipment rental services; shipbuilding services; window cleaning services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |