USPTO serial 78111797
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Battery monitoring systems comprised of telesensors measuring voltage, current, and temperature, connecting to each battery for industrial equipment, including telecommunication infrastructure, cellular telephony infrastructure and utilities infrastructure to indicate battery health | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2002 |
| 042 | Remote monitoring of battery health, utilizing telesensors measuring voltage, current, and temperature | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |