USPTO serial 78116593
ACTIVE ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Vandigriff
JOHN E VANDIGRIFF190 N STEMMONS FWY STE 200LEWISVILE, TX 75067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in making cosmetics | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1981 |
| 003 | Naturally derived materials used alone or as ingredients in the preparation of cosmetics, namely, anti-aging creams and aromatherapy oils | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1981 |
| 005 | Naturally derived material used alone or as ingredients in pharmaceutical preparations, including for the treatment of dry and chaffing skin | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1981 |
| 030 | Food supplement products | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |