USPTO serial 78117914
IMPACT GEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IMPACT GEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melrose, WI
Ettrick, WI
MELROSE, WI
MELROSE, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan R. Rosiejka
2950 Saffron LaneNeenah, WI 54956United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Flexible polymer gel for use on horse hoofs in providing impact-resistance and vibration-resistance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mattec Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT GEL HOLDINGS
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT GEL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT GEL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named IMPACT GEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 15, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |