USPTO serial 78118484
ALPACAMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPACAMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Whitmore Lake, MI
Whitmore Lake, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | clothing made in whole or substantially part of alpaca wool, namely shirts, hats, socks, dresses, suits, coats, pants, tops, blouses, belts, scarves, stoles, capes, sweaters, shawls, jackets, overcoats, mittens, gloves, berets, t-shirts, and sweatshirts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |