Drawing for PERFECT PORTIONS

USPTO serial 78119054

PERFECT PORTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT PORTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

Julia Spoor Gard BARNES & THORNBURG LLPP.O. BOX 2786Chicago, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008CHILDREN'S FEEDING UTENSILS, NAMELY, SPOONSACTIVEDec 1, 2002
010CHILDREN'S FEEDING UTENSILS, NAMELY, BABY BOTTLES AND CUPS ADAPTED FOR FEEDING CHILDRENACTIVEDec 1, 2002
020CHILDREN'S FEEDING ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, JAR TOPPERS, NAMELY PLASTIC CAPS FOR FORMULAACTIVEDec 1, 2002
021CHILDREN'S FEEDING UTENSILS, NAMELY, BOWLS, CUPS, PLATES, MEAL TRAYS, AND BOTTLE BRUSHESACTIVEDec 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2006MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT
Nov 20, 2006ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT
Apr 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 16, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 16, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 25, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance