USPTO serial 78119187
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EL SEGUNDO, CA
EL SEGUNDO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE L. MCSHANE
MICHELE L MCSHANE MATTEL, INC333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, CASES FOR ACTION FIGURES, TOY WEAPONS, TOY ARMOR, TOY SWORDS, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, TOY CAP PISTOLS, TOY VEHICLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, TOY AIRPLANES; TOY VEHICLE PLAYSETS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; TOY VEHICLE TRACK SETS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; COLLECTIBLE TOY FIGURES, PLUSH TOYS, DRAWING TOYS, TOY BANKS, TALKING TOYS, TOY CONSTRUCTION BLOCKS, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, JIGSAW PUZZLES, BUBBLE MAKING WAND AND SOLUTION SETS, BODY BOARDS, ROLLER SKATES, IN-LINESKATES, ICE SKATES, RIDE-ON TOYS, SKATEBOARDS, MINIATURE SKATEBOARDS, PLASTIC TOY HOOPS, TOY PINWHEELS, KITES, PLAY TENTS, PLAY HOUSES, PLAY SWIMMING POOLS, WATER-SQUIRTING TOYS, SAND TOYS, SAND TOYS, SAND BOX TOYS, BATH TOYS, BALLOONS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF CRACKERS OR NOISEMAKERS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, ADULT AND CHILDREN PARTY GAMES, CARD GAMES, BOARD GAMES, ROLE-PLAYING GAMES, ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, COIN-OPERATED ARCADE GAMES, ELECTRONIC HAND-HELD GAMES, NAMELY, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS, CHRISTMAS TREE SKIRTS, CHRISTMAS STOCKINGS, HALLOWEEN COSTUME MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |