Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78119958?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78119958. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DIAMOND PRO?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78119958, the listed owner(s) include: GameTech International, Inc., GameTech International, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78119958?

Serial number 78119958 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DIAMOND PRO. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover DIAMOND PRO?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 028. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: DIAMOND PRO Serial# 78119958 | status 606; last event ASCK | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of DIAMOND PRO?

DIAMOND PRO (78119958) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LARA PEARSON

LARA PEARSON LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON, LTD.774 MAYS BLVD., NO. 10, PMB 405INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Electronic equipment, namely, hardware and software for use in aiding the playing of bingo	ACTIVE	—
028	Games, namely, bingo game playing equipment; hand held unit for playing electronic games, namely, bingo	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 17, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Sep 9, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 8, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2008	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Apr 30, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Apr 30, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Apr 30, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2008	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Feb 20, 2008	TPEX	SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	—
Feb 20, 2008	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Feb 20, 2008	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Dec 19, 2007	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2007	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Aug 4, 2007	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Apr 30, 2007	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Apr 30, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2007	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 31, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 15, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 9, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 2, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 31, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 12, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 25, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 25, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2006	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 5, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 9, 2004	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 31, 2003	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Nov 8, 2003	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Oct 23, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 23, 2003	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2003	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Mar 11, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 13, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 13, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 6, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 12, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

DIAMOND PRO