USPTO serial 78123155
PRO NAIL SUPPLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO NAIL SUPPLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Garland, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Jenkins
BRIAN JENKINS JENKINS INCORPORATED12400 VENTURA BLVD #121STUDIO CITY, CA 91604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty nail care supply and manufacturing products and accessories namely; polishes, creams, buffing lotions, cleansing lotions, artificial fingernails and products used in applying, sculpting, and removing artificial fingernails, namely, nail tips, acrylic liquid and powder, preparation primer, adhesive glue, application gel, gel hardener, silk wraps, liquid sealer, liquid nail remover, and liquid finishing blends, Nail enamel, nail polish, nail top and base coats, and liquids applied to the nail to prevent nail cracking and chipping. | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |