USPTO serial 78123618
TRUSTED ANTIVIRUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUSTED ANTIVIRUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer program for use in identifying and removing computer viruses; system for secure delivery of virus definition files over a global computer network using a public key infrastructure; system for secure delivery of virus definition files over a local computer network using a public key infrastructure; rating system for various systems used in identifying and removing computer viruses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |