USPTO serial 78124565
CREATION LAMIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREATION LAMIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Kammer
PAMELA B HUFF COX SMITH MATTHEWS INCORPORATED112 E PECAN ST STE 1800SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes; toilet waters; eau de colognes; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; toilet preparations, namely, after shave lotion, after shave balm, body sprays, soaps; toilet articles, namely, bath gel, shower gel, body cream, skin toner, perfumed moisturizing cream; antiperspirants; deodorants for personal use; non-medicated hair, scalp, skin, and nail care preparations, namely, nail enamel, nail colors, hair spray, hair bleaching preparations, hair highlighters, hair lighteners; hair shampoos and conditioners; hand lotions; body lotions; dentifrices; shaving preparations; and dyes for the hair | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |