USPTO serial 78124666
MASALA ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASALA ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaplesh Kumar
KAPLESH KUMAR LAW OFFICE25 REDWING RDWELLESLEY, MA 02481UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Restaurant franchising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |