USPTO serial 78124693
FUNFRESH FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUNFRESH FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley E. Soper or Alison Pitt
1400 KEARNS BLVD, 2ND FLPARK CITY, UT 84060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements; herbal supplements; mineral supplements; vitamins; vitamin supplements; nutritional drink mix for use as a meal supplement; nutritional food bars; nutritional meal replacement powders; dietary foods supplements; baby food | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Veggie burgers; packaged bulk foods namely bulk dried fruit, bulk processed nuts; marinated vegetables; freeze dried vegetables; dried fruit and vegetable chips; olive oil; milk; eggs; applesauce; butter; canned vegetables; potato chips; cream cheese; vegetable spreads; fruit preserves; tuna fish; marmalade; processed fruit; dried fruit; preserved fruit; cooked fruit; dried vegetables; cooked vegetables; preserved vegetables; prunes; raisins; roasted nuts; sesame sticks; potato sticks; spinach sticks; onion sticks; vegetable sticks; trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and fruit; processed dates; processed soy beans; soy products, namely; dried soybeans, soy chips, soy nuts; dried soy drink mixes; yogurt; frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; frozen fruit; frozen vegetables; soy based milk beverage used as a milk substitute; cheese; peanut butter; processed olives; soups; frozen French fried potatoes; cooking spray; fruit based spreads; canned fruits; processed beans; processed currents; lentils; processed kelp; processed figs; powdered milk; vegetable protein to be used as an extender or meat substitute; processed edible seeds; hummus; cut fresh vegetables; canned tomatoes; canned tomato paste; tomato sauce; processed edible beans and seeds; processed alfalfa seed; processed flax seed; processed poppy seed; processed edamame; baba ghannouj; meat; fish; poultry; meat extracts; jellies; jams; fruit sauces, namely, appled, and cranberry sauce; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed cereals; processed grains; cereal-based food bar and snack foods; rice-based food bars and snack foods; wheat-based food bars and snack foods; grain-based food bars and snack foods; granola-based food bars and snack foods; pasta sauce; salsa; tortilla chips; pizzas; bulk candy; pretzels; mayonnaise; coffee beans; cookies; waffles; maple syrup; ketchup; corn and flour tortillas; pasta; bread; focaccia bread; chocolate; pies; iced tea; popped popcorn; processed corn snacks; buns; mustard; organic coffee; tea; organic cocoa; barbecue sauce; pesto sauce; macaroni; fructose; wheat germ; crackers; spices; granola; sugar; rice; breadcrumbs; flour; mixes for making bakery goods; organic processed herbs for cooking; frozen pasta; cookie dough; frozen yogurt; ice cream; frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of pasta or rice; honey; vinegar; salt; soy chips; corn sticks; rice based snacks; muesli; tomato sauce; millet; barley; quinoa; amaranth; arrowroot powder; wheat berries; rye berries; bulk dried spices; fruit sauces, namely, apricot and peach sauce | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables; living natural plants and live flowers; unprocessed cereals; unprocessed herbs; unprocessed beans; unprocessed rice; unprocessed grains for eating; pet food; unpopped popcorn; bulk fresh nuts; raw nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated water; drinking water; fruit juice; vegetable juice; fruit drinks; vegetable drinks; apple juice; orange juice; cranberry juice; grapefruit juice; fruit juice concentrates; vegetable juice concentrates; carbonated soft drinks; non-carbonated soft drinks; fruit flavored soft drinks; sport drinks; preparations for making fruit drink beverages and soy based fruit drink beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FUNFRESH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FUNFRESH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutraceutical Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FUNFRESH FOODS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |