USPTO serial 78124888
THE ORIGINAL PIZZA PUCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177601Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL PIZZA PUCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant, food services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2011 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |