Drawing for RAW

USPTO serial 78124889

RAW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

LAUREN A DIENES-MIDDLEN WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION ENTERTAINMENT1241 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnets; cinematographic films featuring sports entertainment; motion picture films made for television featuring sports entertainment; pre-recorded phonograph records featuring sports entertainment; pre-recorded audio tapes featuring sports entertainment; compact discs featuring sports entertainment; amusement gaming machines; computer games in the form of cartridges, tapes, software, game discs; video games in the form of cartridges, tapes, software, game discs; prerecorded video tapes featuring sports entertainment; prerecorded audio tapes featuring sports entertainment; photographic cameras; mouse pads; eyewear, namely, eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass cords made of cord, eyeglass cords made of plastic, eyeglass cases.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 9, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 10, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 23, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance