Drawing for CORNFIELDS

USPTO serial 78125188

CORNFIELDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORNFIELDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Lanser

JOSEPH R LANSER BULLWINKEL PARTNERS, LTD19 S LASALLE STSTE 1300CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030popped popcorn in decorative tins; popped popcorn of various flavors and texturesACTIVEJan 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance