USPTO serial 78125657
THE CORPORATE CIRCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- SNAPP,TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE CORPORATE CIRCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Escondido, CA
Escondido, CA
Escondido, CA
Escondido, CA
Escondido, CA
Escondido, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF FICTION BOOKS | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Adela
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Adela
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Adela
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Michael
- Other trademarks owned by Polin, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE CORPORATE CIRCUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |